Sell by date for schools?

Sell by date for schools?

This post by Australian thought-leader and educator (and friend of the former National CPD team) Greg Whitby informs and contributes to SELMAS conversations on transforming schools – ambition or reality? We’ve been asking these questions for some time now, and there is a clear tension between the ambition of some reforms and the inherent conservatism when it comes to changing structures, just one example might be  working the original “big ideas” of CfE  into a 30 period week in secondary schools. Paradoxically a consequence of CfE in primary schools  seems to be a more rigidly timetabled curriculum for younger children, which seems to work against some of the principles and original intentions of the reform.

Greg here makes references to other thought leaders who have featured in SELMAS discussions and all in all makes a great contribution to the debate which we developed at the Spring Forum. It reminds me very much of the conversation going on at my table. There was a lot of talk of the structures of education being pared down, and people putting things back that had been removed, but we were asking the question, what if the structure isn’t fit for purpose? Do we need a different structure? Ken Greer used the analogy of the Forth Road Bridge, a structure in constant need of repair and reform. Maybe we don’t need a bridge, maybe we need a boat instead?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s